HERITAGE SERVICES UP FOR REVIEW
As the national deficit reduction reaches into every corner of the land, it has now arrived at the door of the Isle of Wight Heritage Service. Throughout October the council will be carrying out a review of heritage departments as part of their programme to seek savings across all services.
|
The Heritage Service covers the record office, museums, archaeology and the local collection. It amounts to a fairly minor element within overall council expenditure and its storage facilities are probably more significant than its labour cost. It is an unfortunate fact of council life that the only time centres like this receive serious attention is when cuts are in the air. The council are nevertheless obliged to seek savings across the board and the service is unlikely to emerge unchanged.
Not so long ago the service was promoting the idea of a new Isle of Wight Heritage Centre (Feb 2008 news item). This was going to embrace the now scattered departments under one roof, providing a comprehensive one-stop facility for the public. Originally it was thought this would be based at a vacated Nodehill School in Newport, but subsequent changes to the education programme seem to have ruled that out. The new centre was to be principally financed by a grant but would almost certainly involve a cost to the council, so it seems unlikely it will now go ahead on the grand scale initially envisaged. However, the review may well consider a more modest plan B if economies can be obtained from the consolidation of some facilities.
The heart of the problem facing the heritage service lies in record office facilities. It is said the department is short of space and lacks the environmental and security controls necessary to meet government standards. As a consequence National Archives could insist some material be removed from the Island, leaving local researchers at a disadvantage. At present it's not clear exactly what the council's statutory obligation is in the preservation of archives. This matter has been drifting along unresolved for years. Now a formal review of the department is underway there is no excuse not to resolve it, and the review body will be less than competent if they fail to arrive at the necessary recommendations. The outcome must provide clarification and state precisely what the goal is relative to archives, and how and when the council is going to achieve it.
A survey conducted in 2007 showed people found the staff friendly and helpful throughout all departments, while noting it was a dispersed and under-promoted service. Current staff levels are probably designed to do little more than meet the council's statutory obligations, leaving potential labour savings somewhat limited. Unlike many council departments, some staff provide a service to the community beyond their contracted duties, through a natural enthusiasm for their subject. It is important that the review process and implementation leave this enthusiasm undimmed.
The question of part privatisation could rear its head. It is doubtful whether a review body of council officers would propose it but it's the kind of option that can arise at the hands of councillors. On past experience, it's unlikely any economic justification would withstand scrutiny.
|
|