HISTORIC ELEMENTS IN THE PUBLISHED MEDINA YARD PLANNING APPLICATION
Following rejection of the East Cowes Regeneration plan, attention now turns to the proposed Medina Yard development at West Cowes, where there are important features representing the history of Island shipbuilding. The basic details of the planning application have been published in the County Press, but at the time of writing, full details have yet to appear online.
|
|
|
|
The development is presented in the form of an unusual hybrid application. There are three phases. Phase 1, at the northern end, is a detailed planning application while the other phases seek only outline planning permission. The north end of the site comprises residential and leisure facilities, becoming industrial to the south. Even if planning permission is granted and phase 1 gets underway, there is no guarantee subsequent phases will be progressed. The development calls for demanding remedial work and flood protection. Any unforeseen problems arising during the development on phase 1 could have implications for the viability of subsequent phases. It is thought the developer, Harrison Trust, intends to retain management control of the site once it is completed.
In a notable departure from previous publicity, the planned museum covering boat building and shipbuilding has been moved from phase 1 to phase 2. The developer has supported the Classic Boat Museum's urgent need for new premises by providing them with a large shed just outside phase 1, for which they have initially been given a five year lease. The museum facility might develop around this site, irrespective of whether phase 2 ever comes to fruition. Unlike the proposed museum, it is large enough to accommodate their entire collection. These arrangements initially only provide for boat building presentation. It is unclear where this leaves the timing of museum coverage for J S White and shipbuilding history.
A refurbished hammerhead crane will form the centrepiece of the phase 1 development, fronting leisure facilities and residential properties. The crane is planned as a static monument. There is some controversy as to whether it should be operational. Technically, it was Grade II listed as an operating crane and should therefore be returned to that status. It is not yet known whether Historic England will press for an operating crane, but even if they do, it doesn't follow the developer will agree to it. The increased tourist appeal is a factor but the Harrison Trust are clearly unconvinced there would be sufficient financial rewards to justify the additional costs in capital and health and safety controls.
Councillors were present at a meeting where the tourist benefits of an operating crane were put to the developer but it apparently had little effect. Whatever the intention of the meeting, it appears to have resulted in councillors arriving at a policy that leaves the decision at the discretion of the developer. In truth, an operating crane can probably only be secured if planners are prepared to make it a condition of planning permission.
|
|